QUASHING · GROUNDS, TESTS AND LIMITS
For Quashing Lawyers in Chandigarh High Court, the linked decisions explain the grounds, tests and limits governing challenges to criminal proceedings and orders. Compare the challenged act with the Court’s reasoning to identify a supported defect and frame the petition’s grounds and requested consequence precisely.
Search all judgments and articles
Explore a judgment: Dinesh Gupta v. The State of Uttar Pradesh and Another
The complaint named parents-in-law but lacked particular acts connecting them with the alleged offences. The Supreme Court quashed cognizance and the complaint because general family allegations could not sustain prosecution against them.
ComplaintsRead entryThe Court rejected the High Court's view that cheating under Section 415 always requires property. It nevertheless dismissed the complainant's challenge, leaving the matrimonial complaint quashed.
FIRRead entryThe complaint named two distant relatives without describing their individual acts. The Supreme Court quashed proceedings against them while leaving the allegations concerning other accused unresolved.
Criminal ProceedingsRead entry